Uma tipologia das representações e das práticas da interdisciplinaridade entre os professores do primário no Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apoiando-se sobre os resultados de trabalhos de pesquisa realizadas no decurso dos dez últimos anos, apresenta uma tipologia das representações e das práticas interdisciplinares entre os professores primários no Quebec. Quatro tendências principais constituem os pólos de dois processos que se cruzam. Essas tendências caracterizam as representações e as práticas de interdisciplinaridade escolar que não são ou que não estão longe de um acordo com a concepção de interdisciplinaridade que assegura uma dependência recíproca, sem predominância e sem ignorância, entre as disciplinas escolares e que favorecem o estabelecimento de complementaridade e de intercalações efetivas. Palavras-Chave: escola primária; interdisciplinaridade; práticas de ensino; educação no Quebec; repressentações sociais. Abstract Based on their last ten years researches, the authors are presenting a classification model of the interdisciplinary practices and their social representations as shared by Québec's elementary school teachers. Four main tendencies are forming the polarities of two continuums within a cartesian plan. These polarities are tipical of some representations and practices which are, in their turn, coherent or not with a perception of an interdisciplinary approach that might be based on conflictual conceptions of the hierachical ordreing of the knowledges identifies to the school matters. the inderdependency and equivalent weighting given to the school matters or, on the contrary, the unequal weight given to various matters and dependency of the contents based on the social importance given to some of these matters are determining the possibility of an interdisciplinary teaching or, in a reverse perspective, pseudo or uninterdisciplinary practices. Key-Words: primary school; interdisciplinarity; teacher's practices; Quebec aducation; social representations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".