MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Identifying the Specific Causes and the Determinants of Outcome in Kidney Recipients with Transplant Glomerulopathy

2018· article· en· W2883499675 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olivier Aubert, Sarah Higgins, Jean–Paul Duong Van Huyen, Denis Viglietti, Marc Raynaud, B. Sis, Luis Hidalgo, Marion Rabant, M. Mengel, Denis Glotz, Christophe Legendre, Patricia Campbell, Carmen Lefaucheur, Alexandre Loupy

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBiopsyPopulationGastroenterologyInternal medicineKidneyKidney transplantationKidney transplantProteinuriaGlomerulopathyKidney diseasePathologySurgeryUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Understanding the specific causes of TG and its long-term consequences at population scale is lacking. Methods This study includes all kidney allograft biopsies performed between January 2004 and January 2014 in three French referral centers and one Canadian center showing TG (Banff cg score≥1 by light microscopy). All TG cases were extensively phenotyped and systematically assessed using light microscopy, immunohistochemistry (IH), immunofluorescence (IF), together with circulating anti-HLA-DSA at the time of biopsy. Results Among the 8,207 post-transplant allograft biopsies performed during the inclusion period, 552 (6.7%) presented with double contours and corresponded to 385 patients. Three predominant overlapping etiologies accounted for 466 (84.4%) cases. 417 biopsies showed antibody-mediated injury (75.5%), 90 biopsies showed TMA (16.3%), 65 showed MPGN (11.8%), while 86 (15.6%) remained equivocal with no specific cause identified (Figure 1). The median time of TG diagnosis post-transplant was 33.18 months (IQR: 12.12 – 78.72 months). Kidney allograft survival after TG diagnosis was 69.4% at 3 years, 57.1% at 5 years, 43.3% at 7 years and 25.5% at 10 years (Figure2). After adjusting for donor, recipient and transplant characteristics, immunological and histological parameters, we identified the following independent factors associated with long-term allograft survival in patients with TG: eGFR (HR: 0.96; CI 95% (0.95-0.98); p<0.001) and proteinuria level (squared transformation) (HR: 2.16; CI 95% (1.76-2.65); p<0.0001) at the time of biopsy, deceased donor (HR: 1.62; CI 95% (1.11-2.40); p=0.016), delay between transplantation and TG diagnosis (log transformation) (HR:1.31; CI 95% (1.16-1.49); p<0.001), vasculitis Banff score (HR: 1.66; IC 95% (1.04-2.65); p=0.032) and TG biopsy with ongoing disease process (HR: 1.55; IC 95% (1.01-2.391); p=0.047). Conclusion Using a large cohort of kidney recipients with a diagnosis of TG and a systematic phenotyping, we identify three overlapping pathways in TG: ABMR, TMA and MPGN. The identification of the main independent determinants of TG prognosis may help improving risk stratification and define specific causes and disease process in patients with TG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantation→Same topicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies→French-language works237,207→