Potential Energy of the Electron in a Hydrogen Atom and a Model of a Virtual Particle Pair Constituting the Vacuum
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a previously published paper, the author made some mistakes in calculating the potential energy of the electron in a hydrogen atom. Those mistakes occurred due to applying a potential energy formula with a certain range of application in a region where it is not applicable. Therefore, this paper corrects that error by deriving a formula for potential energy with no range of application. The paper also proposes a model in which a virtual particle pair present in the vacuum region inside a hydrogen atom simultaneously has a photon with positive energy and a photon with negative energy (In this paper, these photons are called dark photons). In the state where the relativistic energy is zero, the sum of the positive energy and negative energy of the virtual particle pair becomes zero. According to this model, this makes it possible for the particles to release photons, and capture negative energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it