MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883595295 · doi:10.1590/0102-4698180899

OS JOVENS E A ESCRITA: PRÁTICAS ESCOLARES E EXTRAESCOLARES EM PORTUGAL

2018· article· pt· W2883595295 on OpenAlexaff
Inês Cardoso, Luí­sa Álvares Pereira, Célia da Graça Lopes, Rui Patrício Andrade Pereira Lopes

Bibliographic record

VenueEducação em Revista · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWriting and Handwriting Education
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO: Apresentaremos as práticas de escrita, em contextos escolares (por injunção professoral) e extraescolares (livres), reportadas por alunos, dos 9 aos 15 anos, no Ensino Básico (EB) em Portugal, por meio de inquérito por questionário a nível nacional. Essas práticas são expressão da vasta e dinâmica relação com a escrita (re)construída pelos sujeitos. A Didática da Escrita (DE) tem salientado, justamente, a relevância de conhecer mais aprofundadamente a relação que os indivíduos (re)constroem com o ato de escrever, pois nela estão ancoradas as motivações e os fatores de afastamento e rejeição desta prática de produção verbal. Os resultados indicam maior diversidade de escritos no contexto extraescolar, contrastando com focos de atuação escritural mais preponderantes na escola, procurando atender a prioridades de ensino-aprendizagem. Emergem, contudo, elementos de conexão entre os dois contextos, que (in)formam para uma atuação didática mais favorecedora de um percurso escritural significativo para os sujeitos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducação em RevistaSame topicWriting and Handwriting EducationFrench-language works237,207