MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883612868 · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2859781

A Collaborative PHY-Aided Technique for End-to-End IoT Device Authentication

2018· article· en· W2883612868 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkCryptographyAuthentication (law)Authentication protocolComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, Internet of Things (IoT) devices are rapidly proliferating to support a vast number of end-to-end (E2E) services and applications, which require reliable device authentication for E2E data security. However, most low-cost IoT end devices with limited computing resources have difficulties in executing the increasingly complicated cryptographic security protocols, resulting in increased vulnerability of the virtual authentication credentials to malicious cryptanalysis. An attacker possessing compromised credentials could be deemed legitimate by the conventional cryptography-based authentication. Although inherently robust to upper-layer unauthorized cryptanalysis, the device-to-device physical-layer (PHY) authentication is practically difficult to be applied to the E2E IoT scenario and to be integrated with the existing, well-established cryptography primitives without any conflict. This paper proposes an enhanced E2E IoT device authentication that achieves seamless integration of PHY security into traditional asymmetric cryptography-based authentication schemes. Exploiting the collaboration of several intermediate nodes (e.g., edge gateway, access point, and full-function device), multiple radio-frequency features of an IoT device can be estimated, quantized, and used in the proposed PHY identity-based cryptography for key protection. A closed-form expression of the generated PHY entropy is derived for measuring the security enhancement. The evaluation results of our cross-layer authentication demonstrate an elevated resistance to various computation-based impersonation attacks. Furthermore, the proposed method does not impose any extra implementation overhead on resource-constrained IoT devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it