MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883709728 · doi:10.34194/ggub.v191.5138

Lower–Middle Ordovician stratigraphy of North-East Greenland

2002· article· en· W2883709728 on OpenAlexaff
Svend Stouge, W. Douglas Boyce, Jørgen Løye Christiansen, David A. T. Harper, Ian Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology of Greenland Survey Bulletin · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Newfoundland and Labrador
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrdovicianGeologyPaleozoicPaleontologyRipheanEcological successionRodiniaSupercontinentLaurentiaSedimentary rockStratigraphyBalticaRiftTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Upper Proterozoic (Riphean) to Lower Palaeozoic succession in North-East Greenland is exposed in a broad N–S-trending belt in the fjord region between 71°38´ and 74°25´N (Fig. 1). The succession comprises mainly marine sediments accumulated during the later stages of the break-up of the Rodinia supercontinent, the subsequent opening of the Iapetus Ocean and formation of the passive margin along the edge of the Laurentian palaeocontinent. Investigations of the sedimentary succession were initiated on Ella Ø in the summer of 2000 as part of a project to investigate the development of the Laurentian margin facing the Iapetus Ocean in the Early Palaeozoic, when studies of the uppermost formations of the Riphean Eleonore Bay Supergroup to the Lower Ordovician Antiklinalbugt Formation on Ella Ø were undertaken (Stouge et al. 2001). Ella Ø was revisited during the summer of 2001, with the focus on the Ordovician formations. In addition, investigations were undertaken in the Albert Heim Bjerge area where the uppermost part of the Ordovician succession is preserved (Fig. 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeology of Greenland Survey BulletinSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207