Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Perforators of the Integument in the Human Thigh
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soft tissue defects resulting from trauma, cancer surgery or congenital\nabnormalities can occur throughout the body, and are reconstructed with surgical flaps by\nplastic surgeons. Perforator flaps are the most recent applications of surgical tissue\ntransfers. These tissue transfers are reliant on a single artery and vein, which perfuse a\nportion of tissue with the blood required for survival. As a result of diminished flap bulk,\nminimal donor site morbidity, and more donor site choices, perforator flaps are\nconsidered to be an advanced form of tissue transfer.\nFifteen thighs obtained from 10 fresh human cadavers were studied. This study\nemployed the 3D imaging software, Materialiseâs Interactive Medical Image Control\nSystem (MIMICS), to create 3D models of the vascular anatomy of the thigh.\nIn total there is an average of 88 ± 16 arterial perforators supplying the integument of the\nthigh from nine source arteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".