Revealing Unexplored Sequence-Function Space Using Sequence Similarity Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapidly expanding number of protein sequences found in public databases can improve our understanding of how protein functions evolve. However, our current knowledge of protein function likely represents a small fraction of the diverse repertoire that exists in nature. Integrative computational methods can facilitate the discovery of new protein functions and enzymatic reactions through the observation and investigation of the complex sequence-structure-function relationships within protein superfamilies. Here, we highlight the use of sequence similarity networks (SSNs) to identify previously unexplored sequence and function space. We exemplify this approach using the nitroreductase (NTR) superfamily. We demonstrate that SSN investigations can provide a rapid and effective means to classify groups of proteins, therefore exposing experimentally unexplored sequences that may exhibit novel functionality. Integration of such approaches with systematic experimental characterization will expand our understanding of the functional diversity of enzymes and their associated physiological roles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it