MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883806766 · doi:10.11575/prism/32374

Review of CRP Governance to Support Regional Water and Wastewater Servicing

2010· article· en· W2883806766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grant Thornton Llp

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Conservation and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate governanceWastewaterBusinessWater resource managementEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Calgary Metropolitan Plan (CMP) identifies the important role regional water and wastewater infrastructure and servicing systems will have in enabling the Calgary Region to achieve the right balance among protecting the regional environment, providing efficient and effective delivery of municipal services, and enhancing regional prosperity. To move forward with regional servicing, consistent with the CMP, it was recognized that a critical first step was the development of a governance structure that supports implementation and allows the Calary Regional Partnership (CRP) and its members to address a wide array of implementation questions and issues. To this end, the CRP engaged Grant Thornton to assist it in developing a governance structure that will support implementation of regional water and wastewater servicing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.818
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicEnvironmental Conservation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207