MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883822530 · doi:10.5539/apr.v10n4p1

Absolute Position and Energy

2018· article· en· W2883822530 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
E. Brodet

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition (finance)PhysicsAbsolute (philosophy)Particle (ecology)Rest (music)UniverseFrame of referenceAbsolute zeroAbsolute magnitudeAbsolute time and spaceRest frameTheoretical physicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we will develop further the absolute position of a particle defined in (1), (2) which involves the particle's decay time or when relevant internal time and the particle's velocity with respect to the expanding universe. We will refine the previous definition to give two separate absolute position definitions, one termed the absolute position at rest and the other termed the absolute position which includes also a contribution of the particle's velocity with respect to the velocity of the expanding universe. Next we will discuss how we may define the particle's absolute energy from the particle's absolute position definition. We will show, how the absolute energy definition may help us to identify a dependence between the particle's decay time, as measured in its rest frame, and its velocity with respect to the expanding universe. Consequently, we will relate the above to the particle's mean lifetime and discuss the affect and relationship of the running coupling constant and the possible mean lifetime dependence on velocity. Finally, experimental ways by which one may investigate and test the above are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207