MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prognostic Biomarkers and Potential Treatment for BK Polyomavirus Associated Nephropathy

2018· article· en· W2883858298 on OpenAlexaff
Minal Borkar-Tripathi, Vikas Srivastava, Ryan H. Cunnington, Steven C. Greenway, Lee Anne Tibbles

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPolyomavirus and related diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA methylationBiologyEpigeneticsDNMT1Cancer researchVirologyMolecular biologyGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction BK polyomavirus reactivation in kidney causes acute kidney disease in immuno-compromised renal transplant patients. Due to lack of an appropriate antiviral therapy against BKV it is important to study the underlying mechanism of pathogenesis causing BK polyoma virus associated nephropathy (BKPVAN). Objective To investigate BKV pathogenesis from an epigenetic point of view and to determine the potential anti-viral therapy against BKPVAN. Methods Human Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cells (HPTCs) and CCD1105 cell lines were infected with BKV. Another set of cells were treated with DNMT1 inhibitor RG108. Urine samples were collected from BKV viruria/viremia positive patients. RNA/DNA was isolated to perform Methylation Specific PCR (MSP) to assess DNA methylation. Expression study was done by using Real-time PCR and western blot assays. Immunofluorscence staining experiment and flow cytometry were performed to demonstrate fibrosis and necroptosis respectively. Results The downregulation of E-cadherin (CDH1) and Collagen-IV (COLIVA1) gene expression was observed in BKV infected cells, whereas, increase in expression of fibrotic marker collagen I suggests that BKV infection induces epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT). MSP confirmed silencing of those genes through a DNA methylation mechanism by demonstrating hypermethylation of the promoters of CDH1 and COLIVA1 genes in patient’s samples. Imunofluorescence staining has shown an increase in Vimentin and disruption of actin filaments in BKV infected cells confirming EMT. RG108 treatment, a demethylating agent, has shown altered COLIVA expression and a decrease in methylation of the promoter, demonstrating that BKV uses DNA methylation for inducing EMT and eventually fibrosis. The protein study confirmed that BKV induced necroptosis by inducing the expression of Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 3, and phospho-Mixed Lineage Kinase Like-pseudokinase and High Mobility Group Protein B1. Regulation by RG108 indicated that BKV may induce necroptosis epigenetically. We observed that BKV hypermethylates the RB1 gene promoter to silence it and instigate host cell division for its own replication however, RG108 treatment had demonstrated significant decrease in BKV DNA (p-value<0.037). Conclusion We have investigated BKV pathogenesis from an epigenetic point of view and we are the first to report that BKV orchestrates EMT and necroptosis by using a DNA methylation mechanism. The hypermethylated promoters of genes could serve as prospective biomarkers for prognosis of fibrosis. The use of DNMT inhibitors could reverse or prevent progression of fibrosis and block BKV replication, therefore, may be potentially useful as an antiviral therapy. However, further studies exploiting DNA methylation mechanism are needed to prevent graft loss due to BKPVAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicPolyomavirus and related diseasesFrench-language works237,207