MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883866470 · doi:10.1021/acsaem.8b00171

Laser Selective Photoactivation of Amorphous TiO<sub>2</sub> Films to Anatase and/or Rutile Crystalline Phases

2018· article· en· W2883866470 on OpenAlexafffund
Jaime Benavides, Charles Trudeau, Luis Felipe Gerlein, Sylvain G. Cloutier

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Energy Materials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAnataseRutileMaterials scienceBrookiteAmorphous solidNanocrystalline materialNanotechnologyPhotocatalysisTitanium dioxideEnergy conversion efficiencyTitaniumFabricationPhotovoltaicsOptoelectronicsChemical engineeringPhotovoltaic systemMetallurgyChemistryCatalysisCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) is a remarkable metal-oxide semiconductor with unique optoelectronic properties ideal for photovoltaics and photocatalytic conversion. The principal crystalline phases for TiO 2 are anatase, rutile, and brookite. The combination of both anatase and rutile crystalline structures can positively impact the optoelectronic properties of TiO 2 films. With standard sol–gel processing, high-temperature conversion generally yields one dominant phase and limits the combined use of anatase and rutile TiO 2 for optoelectronic devices. We report on a singular route to controllably engineer hybrid nanocrystalline films of TiO 2 at room temperature to synergistically exploit both anatase and rutile TiO 2 phases. Relying on sol–gel chemistry, this approach starts from an amorphous film and uses photoinduced activation using a low-power laser to achieve specific spatially controlled pattern consisting of different TiO 2 crystalline phases within the same film. While achieving remarkable precision, reproducibility, and control, we also avoid costly high-temperature, ion-metal-assisted, or specific atmospheric processing that currently prevents the integration of TiO 2 in several optoelectronic platforms. In the future, we believe this unprecedented level of control and the ability to engineer the TiO 2 crystalline structure at the microscopic scale will allow the design and fabrication of novel high-performance TiO 2 hybrids for energy conversion and environmental applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Energy MaterialsSame topicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsFrench-language works237,207