MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883866470 · doi:10.1021/acsaem.8b00171

Laser Selective Photoactivation of Amorphous TiO<sub>2</sub> Films to Anatase and/or Rutile Crystalline Phases

2018· article· en· W2883866470 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Energy Materials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAnataseRutileMaterials scienceBrookiteAmorphous solidNanocrystalline materialNanotechnologyPhotocatalysisTitanium dioxideEnergy conversion efficiencyTitaniumFabricationPhotovoltaicsOptoelectronicsChemical engineeringPhotovoltaic systemMetallurgyChemistryCatalysisCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a remarkable metal-oxide semiconductor with unique optoelectronic properties ideal for photovoltaics and photocatalytic conversion. The principal crystalline phases for TiO2 are anatase, rutile, and brookite. The combination of both anatase and rutile crystalline structures can positively impact the optoelectronic properties of TiO2 films. With standard sol–gel processing, high-temperature conversion generally yields one dominant phase and limits the combined use of anatase and rutile TiO2 for optoelectronic devices. We report on a singular route to controllably engineer hybrid nanocrystalline films of TiO2 at room temperature to synergistically exploit both anatase and rutile TiO2 phases. Relying on sol–gel chemistry, this approach starts from an amorphous film and uses photoinduced activation using a low-power laser to achieve specific spatially controlled pattern consisting of different TiO2 crystalline phases within the same film. While achieving remarkable precision, reproducibility, and control, we also avoid costly high-temperature, ion-metal-assisted, or specific atmospheric processing that currently prevents the integration of TiO2 in several optoelectronic platforms. In the future, we believe this unprecedented level of control and the ability to engineer the TiO2 crystalline structure at the microscopic scale will allow the design and fabrication of novel high-performance TiO2 hybrids for energy conversion and environmental applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it