Moderate and severe hypoxia elicit divergent effects on cardiovascular function and physiological rhythms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key points In the present study, we provide evidence for divergent physiological responses to moderate compared to severe hypoxia, addressing an important knowledge gap related to severity, duration and after‐effects of hypoxia encountered in cardiopulmonary situations. The physiological responses to moderate and severe hypoxia were not proportional, linear or concurrent with the time‐of‐day. Hypoxia elicited severity‐dependent physiological responses that either persisted or fluctuated throughout normoxic recovery. The physiological basis for these distinct cardiovascular responses implicates a shift in the sympathovagal set point and probably not molecular changes at the artery resulting from hypoxic stress. Abstract Hypoxia is both a consequence and cause of many acute and chronic diseases. Severe hypoxia causes hypertension with cardiovascular sequelae; however, the rare studies using moderate severities of hypoxia indicate that it can be beneficial, suggesting that hypoxia may not always be detrimental. Comparisons between studies are difficult because of the varied classifications of hypoxic severities, methods of delivery and use of anaesthetics. Thus, to investigate the long‐term effects of moderate hypoxia on cardiovascular health, radiotelemetry was used to obtain in vivo physiological measurements in unanaesthetized mice during 24 h of either moderate or severe hypoxia, followed by 72 h of normoxic recovery. Systolic blood pressure was decreased during recovery following moderate hypoxia but increased following severe hypoxia. Moderate and severe hypoxia increased haeme oxygenase‐1 expression during recovery, suggesting parity in hypoxic stress at the level of the artery. Severe but not moderate hypoxia increased the low/high frequency ratio of heart rate variability 72 h post‐hypoxia, indicating a shift in sympathovagal balance. Moderate hypoxia dampened the amplitude of circadian rhythm, whereas severe disrupted rhythm during the entire insult, with perturbations persisting throughout normoxic recovery. Thus, hypoxic severity differentially regulates circadian blood pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".