MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883880312 · doi:10.1016/j.ymgmr.2018.06.006

Morquio B patient/caregiver survey: First insight into the natural course of a rare GLB1 related condition

2018· article· en· W2883880312 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Bleier, Nataliya Yuskiv, Tina Priest, Marioara Angela Moisa Popurs, Sylvia Stöckler‐Ipsiroglu

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMucopolysaccharidosisEnzyme replacement therapyPediatricsScoliosisShort statureDiseaseLysosomal storage diseaseAnkleHypoplasiaInternal medicinePhysical therapyPathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Morquio B disease (MBD) or Mucopolysaccharidosis type IV B (MPS IV B) is caused by particular GLB1 mutations specifically affecting the affinity of beta-galactosidase to keratan sulphate, resulting in dysostosis multiplex resembling Morquio A (MPS IV A) disease (GALNS deficiency). Additional neuronopathic features of GM1 II/III (juvenile/adult) gangliosidosis have been reported in some patients. Our patient/caregiver online survey was aimed at elucidating the clinical manifestations of this ultra-rare condition. Comparing to previously published data on MPS IV A, the 30 respondents in our MBD group presented with greater growth chart values (weight and height) and with lesser effects of odontoid hypoplasia. The most common concerns are: (1) mobility issues - 84% having difficulty walking; (2) chronic pain - 96%; (3) surgeries - average 3 per person, 80% for hip problems; (4) hip dysplasia, knee/ankle concerns, and scoliosis. Approximately 50% of MBD participants live independently and actively contributing to society. Evidence from our survey results supports the notion that skeletal manifestations in MBD are milder than in the majority of patients with MPS IV A. The data collected will help with the establishment of clinically meaningful outcomes for future therapeutic trials, and with the counseling of newly diagnosed patients about their health expectations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism ReportsSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207