MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884053119 · doi:10.1101/gad.321117.118

Nuclear pore density controls heterochromatin reorganization during senescence

2019· article· en· W2884053119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes & Development · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilInstitute of GeneticsHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeMedical Research Council CanadaCancer Research UK
KeywordsBiologyHeterochromatinSenescenceNuclear poreCellular senescenceCell biologyGeneticsChromatinDNANucleusGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During oncogene-induced senescence (OIS), heterochromatin is lost from the nuclear periphery and forms internal senescence-associated heterochromatin foci (SAHFs). We show that an increased nuclear pore density during OIS is responsible for SAHF formation. In particular, the nucleoporin TPR is necessary for both formation and maintenance of SAHFs. Loss of SAHFs does not affect cell cycle arrest but abrogates the senescence-associated secretory phenotype-a program of inflammatory cytokine gene activation. Our results uncover a previously unknown role of nuclear pores in heterochromatin reorganization in mammalian nuclei and demonstrate the importance of heterochromatin organization for a specific gene activation program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it