MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884063067 · doi:10.2979/israelstudies.23.3.15

Turning Points in the Historiography of Jewish Immigration from Arab Countries to Israel

2018· article· en· W2884063067 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIsrael Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationHistoriographyJudaismPolitical sciencePopulationAnti-ZionismMass migrationHistoryJewish historyDevelopment economicsLawSociologyJewish studiesDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turning Points in the Historiography of Jewish Immigration from Arab Countries to Israel Esther Meir-Glitzenstein (bio) INTRODUCTION The twentieth century was characterized by mass immigration waves and the establishment of numerous nation-states. Israeli history is considered particularly unique for containing a simultaneous convergence of these phenomena. Israel's population doubled following its establishment, as the State absorbed Jews from European and Arab countries by the hundreds of thousands. These immigrants became the human infrastructure upon which the new nation was built, and marked the "genesis" of Israeli society. Given the complexity and significance of this phenomenon, it is no wonder the subject has become a source of both nostalgia and widespread contention. The article concerns Jewish immigration to Israel from Arab countries through the prism of historical research, with specific focus on major turning points within this historiography. It does not aim for an exhaustive representation of research literature on the subject, nor mention studies on the integration of immigrants into Israeli society and the progression of the ethnic conflict in Israel, as each of these topics merits its own discussion. JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM ARAB COUNTRIES From the declaration of statehood in May of 1948 until the end of 1951, 700,000 new immigrants, half of whom hailed from Europe and half from Arab countries, joined the 650,000 Jews that had been residing in pre-state [End Page 114] Israel. The first to arrive were Holocaust survivors from displaced persons camps in Germany and Cyprus, and Eastern European Jews from Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Yugoslavia, and elsewhere. The mass immigration from Arab countries began in mid-1949 and included three communities that relocated to Israel almost in their entirety: 31,000 Jews from Libya, 50,000 from Yemen, and 125,000 from Iraq. Additional immigrants arrived from Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey, Iran, India, and elsewhere. Within three years, the Jewish population of Israel doubled. The ethnic composition of the population shifted as well, as immigrants from Muslim counties and their offspring now comprised one third of the Jewish population—an unprecedented phenomenon in global immigration history. From 1952–60, Israel regulated and restricted immigration from Muslim countries with a selective immigration policy based on economic criteria, and sent these immigrants, most of whom were North African, to peripheral Israeli settlements. The selective immigration policy ended in 1961 when, following an agreement between Israel and Morocco, about 100,000 Jews immigrated to the State. From 1952–68 about 600,000 Jews arrived in Israel, three quarters of whom were from Arab countries and the remaining immigrants were largely from Eastern Europe. Today fewer than 30,000 remain in Muslim countries, mostly concentrated in Iran and Turkey. This immigration process thoroughly altered the map of the Jewish-Mizrahi diaspora: its vast majority is now based in Israel, with a small minority in France, Britain, the US, Canada, and others. THE ZIONIST NARRATIVE REGARDING IMMIGRATION FROM ARAB COUNTRIES Discourse on the immigration from Arab countries developed in real time. The Israeli State explained it in apocalyptic terms as the realization of the "End of Days" prophecy regarding Jewish redemption in Zion, the result of 2,000-year-old religious-messianic longing. This explanation was widely accepted within and beyond Israel, being rooted in an ancient redemption myth familiar not only to Jews but to all monotheistic religions. The association of the immigration with a biblical prophecy, and the fact that these Jewish communities dated back to the First Temple period, corroborated Zionist claims regarding Jewish historical continuity and the right of Jews to return to Eretz Israel and establish a sovereign state. However, parallel to this discourse, and to great degree in contrast to it, immigration from Arab countries was also discussed as a reaction to antisemitism and [End Page 115] political persecution, and a solution to socio-economic crises. Jewish life in Arab countries was described as life atop an active volcano, and the massive immigration to Israel was therefore the spontaneous and predictable reaction of Jews who had simply suffered enough. This discourse became a formative part of the Israeli ethos, one that found its way to the center of public school curricula and to every sphere...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it