MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2884063067 · doi:10.2979/israelstudies.23.3.15

Turning Points in the Historiography of Jewish Immigration from Arab Countries to Israel

2018· article· en· W2884063067 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueIsrael Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésImmigrationHistoriographyJudaismPolitical sciencePopulationAnti-ZionismMass migrationHistoryJewish historyDevelopment economicsLawSociologyJewish studiesDemography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Turning Points in the Historiography of Jewish Immigration from Arab Countries to Israel Esther Meir-Glitzenstein (bio) INTRODUCTION The twentieth century was characterized by mass immigration waves and the establishment of numerous nation-states. Israeli history is considered particularly unique for containing a simultaneous convergence of these phenomena. Israel's population doubled following its establishment, as the State absorbed Jews from European and Arab countries by the hundreds of thousands. These immigrants became the human infrastructure upon which the new nation was built, and marked the "genesis" of Israeli society. Given the complexity and significance of this phenomenon, it is no wonder the subject has become a source of both nostalgia and widespread contention. The article concerns Jewish immigration to Israel from Arab countries through the prism of historical research, with specific focus on major turning points within this historiography. It does not aim for an exhaustive representation of research literature on the subject, nor mention studies on the integration of immigrants into Israeli society and the progression of the ethnic conflict in Israel, as each of these topics merits its own discussion. JEWISH IMMIGRATION FROM ARAB COUNTRIES From the declaration of statehood in May of 1948 until the end of 1951, 700,000 new immigrants, half of whom hailed from Europe and half from Arab countries, joined the 650,000 Jews that had been residing in pre-state [End Page 114] Israel. The first to arrive were Holocaust survivors from displaced persons camps in Germany and Cyprus, and Eastern European Jews from Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Yugoslavia, and elsewhere. The mass immigration from Arab countries began in mid-1949 and included three communities that relocated to Israel almost in their entirety: 31,000 Jews from Libya, 50,000 from Yemen, and 125,000 from Iraq. Additional immigrants arrived from Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey, Iran, India, and elsewhere. Within three years, the Jewish population of Israel doubled. The ethnic composition of the population shifted as well, as immigrants from Muslim counties and their offspring now comprised one third of the Jewish population—an unprecedented phenomenon in global immigration history. From 1952–60, Israel regulated and restricted immigration from Muslim countries with a selective immigration policy based on economic criteria, and sent these immigrants, most of whom were North African, to peripheral Israeli settlements. The selective immigration policy ended in 1961 when, following an agreement between Israel and Morocco, about 100,000 Jews immigrated to the State. From 1952–68 about 600,000 Jews arrived in Israel, three quarters of whom were from Arab countries and the remaining immigrants were largely from Eastern Europe. Today fewer than 30,000 remain in Muslim countries, mostly concentrated in Iran and Turkey. This immigration process thoroughly altered the map of the Jewish-Mizrahi diaspora: its vast majority is now based in Israel, with a small minority in France, Britain, the US, Canada, and others. THE ZIONIST NARRATIVE REGARDING IMMIGRATION FROM ARAB COUNTRIES Discourse on the immigration from Arab countries developed in real time. The Israeli State explained it in apocalyptic terms as the realization of the "End of Days" prophecy regarding Jewish redemption in Zion, the result of 2,000-year-old religious-messianic longing. This explanation was widely accepted within and beyond Israel, being rooted in an ancient redemption myth familiar not only to Jews but to all monotheistic religions. The association of the immigration with a biblical prophecy, and the fact that these Jewish communities dated back to the First Temple period, corroborated Zionist claims regarding Jewish historical continuity and the right of Jews to return to Eretz Israel and establish a sovereign state. However, parallel to this discourse, and to great degree in contrast to it, immigration from Arab countries was also discussed as a reaction to antisemitism and [End Page 115] political persecution, and a solution to socio-economic crises. Jewish life in Arab countries was described as life atop an active volcano, and the massive immigration to Israel was therefore the spontaneous and predictable reaction of Jews who had simply suffered enough. This discourse became a formative part of the Israeli ethos, one that found its way to the center of public school curricula and to every sphere...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,462
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,993

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,324
Écart entre enseignants0,285 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle