MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Vaporized Cannabis on Exertional Breathlessness and Exercise Endurance in Advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Randomized Controlled Trial

2018· article· en· W2884074058 on OpenAlexafffund
Sara J. Abdallah, Benjamin M. Smith, Mark A. Ware, Michelle Moore, Pei Zhi Li, Jean Bourbeau, Dennis Jensen

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityQuebec Rehabilitation Research NetworkMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University Health Centre
KeywordsMedicineCOPDSpirometryPulmonary function testingCannabisPhysical therapyCardiologyInternal medicinePlaceboEffects of cannabisCannabidiolAnesthesiaAsthmaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale A series of studies conducted approximately 40 years ago demonstrated an acute bronchodilator effect of smoked cannabis in healthy adults and adults with asthma. However, the acute effects of vaporized cannabis on airway function in adults with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain unknown. Objectives To test the hypothesis that inhaled vaporized cannabis would alleviate exertional breathlessness and improve exercise endurance by enhancing static and dynamic airway function in COPD. Methods In a randomized controlled trial of 16 adults with advanced COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], mean ± SD: 36 ± 11% predicted), we compared the acute effect of 35 mg of inhaled vaporized cannabis (18.2% Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, <0.1% cannabidiol) versus 35 mg of a placebo control cannabis (CTRL; 0.33% Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, <0.99% cannabidiol) on physiological and perceptual responses during cardiopulmonary cycle endurance exercise testing; spirometry and impulse oscillometry at rest; and cognitive function, psychoactivity, and mood. Results Compared with CTRL, cannabis had no effect on breathlessness intensity ratings during exercise at isotime (cannabis, 2.7 ± 1.2 Borg units vs. CTRL, 2.6 ± 1.3 Borg units); exercise endurance time (cannabis, 3.8 ± 1.9 min vs. CTRL, 4.2 ± 1.9 min); cardiac, metabolic, gas exchange, ventilatory, breathing pattern, and/or operating lung volume parameters at rest and during exercise; spirometry and impulse oscillometry–derived pulmonary function test parameters at rest; and cognitive function, psychoactivity, and mood. Conclusions Single-dose inhalation of vaporized cannabis had no clinically meaningful positive or negative effect on airway function, exertional breathlessness, and exercise endurance in adults with advanced COPD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03060993).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchFrench-language works237,207