Effect of hypothermia on interleukin-1 receptor antagonist pharmacodynamics in inflammatory-sensitized hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy of term newborns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypothermia is increasingly tested in several neurological conditions, such as neonatal encephalopathy, stroke, traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, spinal cord injury, and neurological outcomes of cardiac arrest. Current studies aim to increase benefits of hypothermia with new add-on therapies including immunomodulatory agents. Hypothermia has been shown to affect the metabolism of commonly used drugs, including those acting on neuroimmune pathways. OBJECTIVE: This study focuses on the effect of hypothermia on interleukin-1 receptor antagonist pharmacodynamics in a model of neonatal encephalopathy. METHODS: The effect of hypothermia on (i) the tissue concentration of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, (ii) the interleukin-1 inflammatory cascade, and (iii) the neuroprotective potential of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist has been assessed on our rat model of neonatal encephalopathy resulting from inflammation induced by bacterial compound plus hypoxia-ischemia. RESULTS: Hypothermia reduced the surface of core and penumbra lesions, as well as alleviated the brain weight loss induced by LPS+HI exposure. Hypothermia compared to normothermia significantly increased (range 50-65%) the concentration of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist within the central nervous system. Despite this increase of intracerebral interleukin-1 receptor antagonist concentration, the intracerebral interleukin-1-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha cascade was upregulated. In hypothermic condition, the known neuroprotective effect of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist was neutralized (50 mg/kg/12 h for 72 h) or even reversed (200 mg/kg/12 h for 72 h) as compared to normothermic condition. CONCLUSION: Hypothermia interferes with the pharmacodynamic parameters of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, through a bioaccumulation of the drug within the central nervous system and a paradoxical upregulation of the interleukin-1 pathway. These effects seem to be at the origin of the loss of efficiency or even toxicity of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist when combined with hypothermia. Such bioaccumulation could happen similarly with the use of other drugs combined to hypothermia in a clinical context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".