MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884158912

Culpa, vida quotidiana i amor: narratives de la Sida en el temps de les triterápies

2017· article· ca· W2884158912 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Poe Lang

Bibliographic record

VenueMètode: Revista de difusió de la investigació · 2017
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and political discourse analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El proposit d’aquest article es analitzar la incidencia del tractament de les triterapies (combinacio de tres farmacs antivirals, proposat en el Congres Internacional sobre la Sida de Vancouver el 1996) en tres textos literaris del corpus seropositiu hispanoamerica. El nostre objectiu es rastrejar les modificacions, pel que fa a les narratives de la sida anteriors, en tres aspectes: el sentiment de culpa, la vida quotidiana i la cerca de l’amor/erotisme. El corpus seleccionat esta compost per l’autobiografia Un ano sin amor. Diario del sida (1998) de l’escriptor argenti Pablo Perez, la novel·la La promesante (2001) de l’escriptora nicaraguenca Rosario Aguilar i el llibre de croniques Vivir con virus. Relatos de la vida cotidiana (2004) de la periodista argentina Marta Dillon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMètode: Revista de difusió de la investigacióSame topicCultural and political discourse analysisFrench-language works237,207