MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884200442 · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2809-y

The age of blood in pediatric intensive care units (ABC PICU): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2018· article· en· W2884200442 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Marisa Tucci, Jacques Lacroix, Dean Fergusson, Allan Doctor, Paul C. Hébert, Robert A. Berg, J. Jaime, Cassandra D. Josephson, Stéphane Leteurtre, Kusum Menon, Kenneth B. Schechtman, Marie E. Steiner, Alexis F. Turgeon, Lucy Clayton, Tina Bockelmann

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaWilfrid Laurier UniversityOttawa HospitalUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteWashington University School of Medicine in St. LouisGroupe canadien de recherche en soins intensifsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistère de la SantéMinistère de la Santé et des Services sociauxOttawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaMinistère des Affaires Sociales et de la SantéWashington University in St. LouisU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyRandomized controlled trialIntensive care unitCritically illPediatric intensive care unitPopulationProtocol (science)Blood transfusionIntensive care medicineClinical trialPediatricsIntensive careEmergency medicineInternal medicineEnvironmental healthAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The "Age of Blood in Children in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit" (ABC PICU) study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to determine if red blood cell (RBC) unit storage age affects outcomes in critically ill children. While RBCs can be stored for up to 42 days in additive solutions, their efficacy and safety after long-term storage have been challenged. Preclinical and clinical observational evidence suggests loss of efficacy and lack of safety of older RBC units, especially in more vulnerable populations such as critically ill children. Because there is a belief that shorter storage will improve outcomes, some physicians and institutions systematically transfuse fresh RBCs to children. Conversely, the standard practice of blood banks is to deliver the oldest available RBC unit (first-in, first-out policy) in order to decrease wastage. METHODS/DESIGN: The ABC PICU study, is a double-blind superiority trial comparing the development of "New or Progressive Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome" (NPMODS) in 1538 critically ill children randomized to either transfusion with RBCs stored for ≤ 7 days or to standard-issue RBCs (oldest in inventory). Patients are being recruited from 52 centers in the US, Canada, France, Italy, and Israel. DISCUSSION: The ABC PICU study should have significant implications for blood procurement services. A relative risk reduction of 33% is postulated in the short-storage arm. If a difference is found, this will indicate that fresher RBCs do improve outcomes in the pediatric intensive care unit population and would justify that use in critically ill children. If no difference is found, this will reassure clinicians and transfusion medicine specialists regarding the safety of the current system of allocating the oldest RBC unit in inventory and will discourage clinicians from preferentially requesting fresher blood for critically ill children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT01977547 . Registered on 6 November 2013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.006
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicBlood transfusion and managementFrench-language works237,207