Effect of ABO blood group on haemostatic parameters in severe haemophilia A patients performing acute moderate-intensity exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
: The primary objective was to assess the effect of ABO blood group on von Willebrand factor (VWF) rise induced by four bouts of moderate-intensity physical activity, on pharmacokinetics of a B-domain-deleted recombinant FVIII (BDD-rFVIII), and haemostatic parameters in severe haemophilia A patients with a null mutation. The secondary objective was to compare the response to exercise according to infused product type in a subgroup of patients who previously participated to the same exercise protocol, while treated with a full length recombinant FVIII (FL-rFVIII). Twenty patients had two visits (rest and exercise). Blood samples were drawn before administration of BDD-rFVIII and at 6 time points, until 24 h postinfusion. FVIII activity increased transiently by 1.1-fold, but only after the first exercise session, as compared to rest. VWF:Ag and platelet count were significantly elevated after each session. Mean FVIII half-life and thromboelastography measurements were unchanged with exercise. However, 14 participants had a slight variation of FVIII half-life with exercise compared to rest (from -3.42 h to +2.51 h). Seven patients demonstrated a longer FVIII half-life (four with O blood group), whereas the remainders had a reduced half-life (three with O blood group). FVIII half-life correlated with baseline VWF:Ag at rest (r = 0.70, P < 0.001) and with exercise (r = 0.67, P < 0.002). Recovery was different between FL-rFVIII and BDD-rFVIII at rest (P = 0.032), but no significant differences were observed between half-life of products at rest and with exercise. ABO blood group and the type of rFVIII administered did not influence the response to exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".