Formation of three-dimensional colloidal crystals in a nematic liquid crystal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the possible structures of three-dimensional colloidal crystals formed when these spherical particles are dispersed in a liquid crystal. The case of a strong homeotropic boundary condition is considered here. Their corresponding defect structures in the space-filler nematic liquid crystal are induced by the presence of the spherical surface of the colloids and produce an attraction between colloidal particles. Here, a standard Landau-de Gennes free energy model for a spatially inhomogeneous liquid crystal is numerically minimized to yield an optimal configuration of both spherical colloids and the orientational field. The stable and metastable structures obtained in this work are described and analyzed according to the type of periodic liquid-crystal defect lines that couple the colloidal spheres together. A large range of the spherical size is covered in this study, corresponding to a 5CB-liquid-crystal comparison for assembling micron- to nano-sized colloidal spheres. Multiple configurations are found for each given particle size and the most stable state is determined by a comparison of the free energies. From large to small colloidal particles, a sequence of structures, which range from quasi-one-dimensional (columnar), to quasi-two-dimensional (planar), and to truly three-dimensional, are found to exist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".