DLA: Compiler and FPGA Overlay for Neural Network Inference Acceleration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Overlays have shown significant promise for field-programmable gate-arrays (FPGAs) as they allow for fast development cycles and remove many of the challenges of the traditional FPGA hardware design flow. However, this often comes with a significant performance burden resulting in very little adoption of overlays for practical applications. In this paper, we tailor an overlay to a specific application domain, and we show how we maintain its full programmability without paying for the performance overhead traditionally associated with overlays. Specifically, we introduce an overlay targeted for deep neural network inference with only ~1% overhead to support the control and reprogramming logic using a lightweight very-long instruction word (VLIW) network. Additionally, we implement a sophisticated domain specific graph compiler that compiles deep learning languages such as Caffe or Tensorflow to easily target our overlay. We show how our graph compiler performs architecture-driven software optimizations to significantly boost performance of both convolutional and recurrent neural networks (CNNs/RNNs) – we demonstrate a 3x improvement on ResNet-101 and a 12x improvement for long short-term memory (LSTM) cells, compared to naive implementations. Finally, we describe how we can tailor our hardware overlay, and use our graph compiler to achieve ~900 fps on GoogLeNet on an Intel Arria 10 1150 – the fastest ever reported on comparable FPGAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".