MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884366062 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2018-0497

A perfect fluid model for compact stars

2019· article· en· W2884366062 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutron starStarsCompact spaceRADIUSGeneral relativityCompact starRedshiftGravitationQuark star

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the framework of Einstein’s theory of general relativity we present a new interior solution with a perfect fluid; this is constructed from the proposal of a gravitational redshift factor. The geometry is regular and density and pressure are monotonic decreasing functions; furthermore, the sound speed is smaller than the light speed and monotonic increasing. The solution depends on a parameter w ∈ (0, 2.037 550 932 5] related to the compactness of the star u = GM/c 2 R, the maximum value of which is u = 0.266 085 831 6, which allows for describing compact stars like quark stars or neutron stars. Although there is a diversity of stars for which the model can be used, we only apply this solution to describe the interior of a neutron star PSR J0348+0432. According to the observations, it is known that its mass M = (2.01 ± 0.04)M ⊙ and its radius is between 12 062 and 12 957 km, so the value of the compactness is in the range u ∈ [0.224 484 5, 0.250 933 8]. In addition to the decreasing behavior of the mentioned pressure and density functions, the results are consistent with the density value range typical of neutron stars and the maximal central density of the star result to be 1.283 818 × 10 18 kg/m 3 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207