MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884447341 · doi:10.1137/17m1132185

Parallel Domain Decomposition Strategies for Stochastic Elliptic Equations. Part A: Local Karhunen--Loève Representations

2018· article· en· W2884447341 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersSandia National LaboratoriesOffice of ScienceKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology
KeywordsDomain decomposition methodsMathematicsDiscretizationApplied mathematicsGalerkin methodProjection (relational algebra)Monte Carlo methodCovarianceStochastic processMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematical analysisFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a method to efficiently determine the dominant Karhunen--Loève (KL) modes of a random process with known covariance function. The truncated KL expansion is one of the most common techniques for the approximation of random processes, primarily because it is an optimal representation, in the mean squared error sense, with respect to the number of random variables in the representation. However, finding the KL expansion involves solving integral problems, which tends to be computationally demanding. This work addresses this issue by means of a work-subdivision strategy based on a domain decomposition approach, enabling the efficient computation of a possibly large number of dominant KL modes. Specifically, the computational domain is partitioned into smaller nonoverlapping subdomains, over which independent local KL decompositions are performed to generate local bases which are subsequently used to discretize the global modes over the entire domain. The latter are determined by means of a Galerkin projection. The procedure leads to the resolution of a reduced Galerkin problem, whose size is not related to the dimension of the underlying discretization space but is actually determined by the desired accuracy and the number of subdomains. It can also be easily implemented in parallel. Extensive numerical tests are used to validate the methodology and assess its serial and parallel performance. The resulting expansion is exploited in Part B to accelerate the solution of the stochastic partial differential equations using a Monte Carlo approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it