Psychopathological features of affective disorders in schizotypal disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To explore psychopathological features of affective disorders in the structure of schizotypal disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 102 patients with schizotypal disorder, aged from 18 to 60 years. Assessment was done using clinical/ psychopathological method and psychometric scales - Calgary depression scale in patients with schizophrenia (CDSS), General Clinical Impression scale (CGI), Yang's mania scale (YMRS). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Affective disorders are noted in the majority of inpatients with schizotypal disorder. They are represented by depressive disorders of variable severity, and mixed depressive states. A group of patients with schizotypal disorder was identified in whom the symptoms of the affective disorder constituted the main clinical picture of the disease, whereas concomitant neurosis-like disorders were formed solely during the exacerbation of depression, correlated with its severity and reduced on antidepressant therapy along with depressive symptoms. Observed reversibility of productive disorders allowed us to consider the dynamic of these states as similar to the atypical affective phase, and the natural course of the disorder as close to the paroxysmal type in the form of distinct depressive phases. In patients with persistent neurosis-like disorders, affective disorders accompanied axial symptoms of the disease and made a large impact on the structure of the exacerbation of the endogenous process. A reduction of depressive symptoms in these patients was accompanied by a decrease in the intensity of axial symptoms of the disease, however the complete reduction of axial symptoms and remission was not observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".