MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884506035 · doi:10.1007/s10456-018-9634-5

PDGF-BB regulates splitting angiogenesis in skeletal muscle by limiting VEGF-induced endothelial proliferation

2018· article· en· W2884506035 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto Giannì-Barrera, Antje Butschkau, Andrea Uccelli, Alessandro Certelli, P. Valente, Mariateresa Bartolomeo, Elena Groppa, Maximilian G. Burger, Ruslan Hlushchuk, M. Heberer, Dirk J. Schaefer, Lorenz Gürke, Valentin Djonov, Brigitte Vollmar, Andrea Banfi

Bibliographic record

VenueAngiogenesis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSchweizerische HerzstiftungSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAngiogenesisSprouting angiogenesisPlatelet-derived growth factor receptorPericyteVascular endothelial growth factorNeovascularizationCell biologyBiologyEndothelial stem cellChemistryGrowth factorCancer researchEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicineReceptorVEGF receptorsIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

VEGF induces normal or aberrant angiogenesis depending on its dose in the microenvironment around each producing cell in vivo. This transition depends on the balance between VEGF-induced endothelial stimulation and PDGF-BB-mediated pericyte recruitment, and co-expression of PDGF-BB normalizes aberrant angiogenesis despite high VEGF doses. We recently found that VEGF over-expression induces angiogenesis in skeletal muscle through an initial circumferential vascular enlargement followed by longitudinal splitting, rather than sprouting. Here we investigated the cellular mechanism by which PDGF-BB co-expression normalizes VEGF-induced aberrant angiogenesis. Monoclonal populations of transduced myoblasts, expressing similarly high levels of VEGF alone or with PDGF-BB, were implanted in mouse skeletal muscles. PDGF-BB co-expression did not promote sprouting and angiogenesis that occurred through vascular enlargement and splitting. However, enlargements were significantly smaller in diameter, due to a significant reduction in endothelial proliferation, and retained pericytes, which were otherwise lost with high VEGF alone. A time-course of histological analyses and repetitive intravital imaging showed that PDGF-BB co-expression anticipated the initiation of vascular enlargement and markedly accelerated the splitting process. Interestingly, quantification during in vivo imaging suggested that a global reduction in shear stress favored the initiation of transluminal pillar formation during VEGF-induced splitting angiogenesis. Quantification of target gene expression showed that VEGF-R2 signaling output was significantly reduced by PDGF-BB co-expression compared to VEGF alone. In conclusion, PDGF-BB co-expression prevents VEGF-induced aberrant angiogenesis by modulating VEGF-R2 signaling and endothelial proliferation, thereby limiting the degree of circumferential enlargement and enabling efficient completion of vascular splitting into normal capillary networks despite high VEGF doses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations132
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngiogenesisSame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207