MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884509547 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06190

Privacy-preserving classifiers recognize shared mobility behaviours from WiFi network imperfect data

2018· preprint· en· W2884509547 on OpenAlexaffabout
Orestes Manzanilla-Salazar, Brunilde Sansò

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceClass (philosophy)ImperfectData miningNoise (video)Tracking (education)Real-time computingArtificial intelligenceComputer networkMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proves the concept that it is feasible to accurately recognize specific human mobility shared patterns, based solely on the connection logs between portable devices and WiFi Access Points (APs), while preserving user's privacy. We gathered data from the Eduroam WiFi network of Polytechnique Montreal, making omission of device tracking or physical layer data. The behaviors we chose to detect were the movements associated to the end of an academic class, and the patterns related to the small break periods between classes. Stringent conditions were self-imposed in our experiments. The data is known to have errors noise, and be susceptible to information loss. No countermeasures were adopted to mitigate any of these issues. Data pre-processing consists of basic statistics that were used in aggregating the data in time intervals. We obtained accuracy values of 93.7 % and 83.3 % (via Bagged Trees) when recognizing behaviour patterns of breaks between classes and end-of-classes, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.078 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207