MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Framework for Understanding the Role of Project Culture for Organizational Project Maturity

2018· book-chapter· en· W2884530029 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan Daniel Rincon

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in logistics, operations, and management science book series · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicConstruction Project Management and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaturity (psychological)Organizational cultureKnowledge managementOPM3Project managementProcess managementBusinessPublic relationsSociologyPolitical scienceEngineeringProject management triangleComputer scienceSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many factors have been analyzed to qualify objectively the maturity of an organization to execute projects. However, there are other aspects that have to be considered. One of them, closely related to the well-known concept of “organizational culture,” is the “project culture.” Project culture can be defined with analogous elements to those of the organizational culture as a system of shared assumptions, values, and beliefs that govern how people behave towards projects in an organization. Very few studies have been made formally available to understand how organizations culturally face projects as opposed to operational activities. This chapter presents existing literature and augments the evidence through several practical examples. Moreover, this chapter attempts to understand why some organizations, even when aware of their organizational culture, either fail to pass on the culture to project activities or even create a completely different and distinct project culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in logistics, operations, and management science book seriesSame topicConstruction Project Management and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207