MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884536308 · doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5148

Fifth‐degree continuous–discrete cubature Kalman filter for radar

2018· article· en· W2884536308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Radar Sonar & Navigation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsKalman filterDegree (music)RadarEnsemble Kalman filterComputer scienceMathematicsExtended Kalman filterGeodesyGeologyPhysicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the authors extend the high‐degree cubature Kalman filter to operate with continuous‐time non‐linear stochastic systems with discrete measurements. For this purpose, they utilise two known approximations to solve the stochastic differential equation used in the modelling of continuous‐time dynamics. The first approach is grounded in an ordinary differential equations solver. The second approach is based on the Itô–Taylor expansion of order 1.5. In addition, the errors presented in each approach were classified. Finally, the proposed filters were compared with the continuous–discrete cubature Kalman filter in a challenging radar‐tracking experiment. The results of the experiment show an improvement in the accuracy of the proposed method, and more importantly, a better performance of the filters based on the Itô–Taylor expansion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it