Comparison of Academic Suspension Levels of Faculty of Sports Sciences Students and Faculty of Education Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Faculty of Education students in terms of age, gender, active sports making, department, graduated high school,mother education level, father education level, mother profession and father occupation variables have beenexamined. A total of 364 university students studying in the Faculty of Sport Sciences and the Faculty of Educationin Gazi University, Hacettepe University and Ankara University were formed the Research group in the academicyears 2017-2018. The Academic Suspension Scale developed by Çakıcı in 2003 was used in the study. It wascompared average scores in unrelated measures, Variance Analysis (one-way ANOVA, independent sample t-test) forcomparison of mean scores in unrelated measures, the Tukey test to determine which groups had significantdifferences were used. In addition, a Pearson Correlation analysis was conducted to test the relationship between theparticles collected in the single sub-dimension. Findings obtained from this research reveal that the students ofFaculty of Sports Sciences showed more academic suspension behaviors than the students of Faculty of Education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".