Best Interest of a Minor Theist: An American and Religiously Informed Response to Canada’s A.C. v. Manitoba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
EWHC 342 (COP), 2014 WL 640403 (Eng.)("[A]nyone capable of making decisions has an absolute right to accept or refuse medical treatment, regardless of the wisdom or consequences of the decision.The decision does not have to be justified to anyone.").7. For a fictional presentation of this issue, consider the novel, The Children Act or the science fiction television episode, Believers.IAN MCEWAN, THE CHILDREN ACT (2014) (set in modern London from the perspective of a High Court Judge who must perform the best-interest test described below for a 17-year-old JW boy); Babylon 5: Believers (Warner Brothers Apr.27, 1994) (An alien child on an Earth-captained space station will die without surgery, but he and his race believe that surgery will release his spirit from his body and permit a demon to maintain the body's life and awareness.).8.It is not clear the extent to which third-party actors can cause spiritual damage to Jehovah's Witnesses, but this is a plausible interpretation of the Watchtower's publications.See What Is Hell?Is It a Place of Eternal Torment?,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".