MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884619371 · doi:10.3233/jifs-169766

E-business information fuzzy retrieval system based on block chain anti-attack algorithm

2018· article· en· W2884619371 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Gao, Malabika Basu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysical Activity and Education Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePrecision and recallBlock (permutation group theory)Data miningDenial-of-service attackWord (group theory)Information retrievalService (business)Fuzzy logicAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceThe InternetWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current e-business information retrieval system ignores the threat of distributed denial of service attack from computer network, which results in low retrieval recall, accuracy, and efficiency. For this problem, a design method of fuzzy retrieval system for e-business information based on block chain technology is proposed in this paper. A fuzzy retrieval system of e-business information is designed, which includes three layers of client, application server and data server. The construction rules of the rule library used by the system are researched. The keyword expansion method of association word list, compound word list and synonymous word list is given. The dynamic knowledge base of the system is built and updated in real-time. Security control of e-business information documents in the system is implemented by using anti-attack performance of block chain technology. Experimental results show that the proposed method improves the recall, accuracy and average accuracy of the system and the retrieval efficiency is high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy SystemsSame topicPhysical Activity and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207