MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Big Data in Massive Parallel Processing

2018· book-chapter· en· W2884667593 on OpenAlex
Vijayalakshmi Saravanan, Anpalagan Alagan, Isaac Woungang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in data mining and database management book series · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataComputer scienceMassively parallelCloud computingData processingDomain (mathematical analysis)Field (mathematics)Distributed computingData scienceParallel computingDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the advent of novel wireless technologies and Cloud Computing, large volumes of data are being produced from various heterogeneous devices such as mobile phones, credit cards, and computers. Managing this data has become the de-facto challenge in the current Information Systems. According to Moore's law, processor speeds are no longer doubling, the processing power also continuing to grow rapidly which leads to a new scientific data intensive problem in every field, especially Big Data domain. The revolution of Big Data lies in the improved statistical analysis and computational power depend on its processing speed. Hence, the need to put massively multi-core systems on the job is vital in order to overcome the physical limits of complexity and speed. It also arises with many challenges such as difficulties in capturing massive applications, data storage, and analysis. This chapter discusses some of the Big Data architectural challenges in the perspective of multi-core processors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0060.026
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it