WBP2 shares a common location in mouse spermatozoa with WBP2NL/PAWP and like its descendent is a candidate mouse oocyte activating factor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sperm-borne oocyte-activating factor (SOAF) resides in the sperm perinuclear theca (PT). A consensus has been reached that SOAF most likely resides in the postacrosomal sheath (PAS), which is the first region of the PT to solubilize upon sperm-oocyte fusion. There are two SOAF candidates under consideration: PLCZ1 and WBP2NL. A mouse gene germline ablation of the latter showed that mice remain fertile with no observable phenotype despite the fact that a competitive inhibitor of WBP2NL, derived from its PPXY motif, blocks oocyte activation when coinjected with WBP2NL or spermatozoa. This suggested that the ortholog of WBP2NL, WBP2, containing the same domain and motifs associated with WBP2NL function, might compensate for its deficiency in oocyte activation. Our objectives were to examine whether WBP2 meets the developmental criteria established for SOAF and whether it has oocyte-activating potential. Immunoblotting detected WBP2 in mice testis and sperm and immunofluorescence localized WBP2 to the PAS and perforatorium of the PT. Immunohistochemistry of the testes revealed that WBP2 reactivity was highest in round spermatids and immunofluorescence detected WBP2 in the cytoplasmic lobe of elongating spermatids and colocalized it with the microtubular manchette during PT assembly. Microinjection of the recombinant forms of WBP2 and WBP2NL into metaphase II mouse oocytes resulted in comparable rates of oocyte activation. This study shows that WBP2 shares a similar testicular developmental pattern and location with WBP2NL and a shared ability to activate the oocyte, supporting its consideration as a mouse SOAF component that can compensate for a WBP2NL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".