Single channel kinetic analysis of the cAMP effect on <i>I<sub>Ks</sub></i> mutants, S209F and S27D/S92D
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The IKs current is important in the heart’s response to sympathetic stimulation. β-adrenergic stimulation increases the amount of IKs and creates a repolarization reserve that shortens the cardiac action potential duration. We have recently shown that 8-CPT-cAMP, a membrane-permeable cAMP analog, changes the channel kinetics and causes it to open more quickly and more often, as well as to higher subconductance levels, which produces an increase in the IKs current. The mechanism proposed to underlie these kinetic changes is increased activation of the voltage sensors. The present study extends our previous work and shows detailed subconductance analysis of the effects of 8-CPT-cAMP on an enhanced gating mutant (S209F) and on a double pseudo-phosphorylated IKs channel (S27D/S92D). 8-CPT-cAMP still produced kinetic changes in S209F + KCNE1, further enhancing gating, while S27D/S92D + KCNE1 showed no significant response to 8-CPT-cAMP, suggesting that these last two mutations fully recapitulate the effect of channel phosphorylation by cAMP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".