MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884733874 · doi:10.1119/1.5034345

Combined viscous and dry friction damping of oscillatory motion

2018· article· en· W2884733874 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsJohn Abbott College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAccelerationDragMechanicsDisplacement (psychology)Classical mechanicsDynamics (music)Viscous dampingAmplitudeMagnetic dampingParticle displacementVibrationAcousticsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The acceleration, velocity, and displacement of a glider on an air track undergoing oscillatory motion subject to viscous and dry frictional damping are investigated using an accelerometer, which allowed a detailed investigation of the dynamics, experimental observation of the predicted acceleration discontinuities due to the reversal of the friction force, and the variation of the drag with time, velocity, and displacement. The investigation included systematic variation of the air track air pressure to explicitly control the relative contribution of viscous and dry frictional damping. Although frictional damping of oscillatory motion has been treated by a number of authors, most investigations have been restricted to measurements of displacement only, with the primary interest being in the decay of the amplitude. In this paper, an exact theory of the acceleration of oscillatory motion, assuming viscous damping proportional to the velocity plus a Coulomb friction force independent of velocity or position, is presented and compared with experiment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it