Robust fluid-structure interaction analysis of an adaptive airfoil using shape memory alloy actuators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the present paper, an aero-structure interaction model for the rapid simulation of morphing structures realized through shape memory alloy (SMA) actuators is presented. The aerodynamic simulation method implements a potential flow method strongly coupled with an integral boundary layer method in the context of a viscous-inviscid interaction approach, which includes a transition prediction model and a simplified shear stress-transport equation for the turbulence closure. The structural analysis model of the airfoil integrates a well-established SMA constitutive model for the prediction of the actuator behavior into finite element software. The two numerical models are loosely interconnected by exchanging geometrical and loading data at each iteration. An articulated 2-link adaptive mechanism for load alleviation purposes in horizontal axis wind turbine blades is investigated considering two different morphing scenarios: (1) operation of a single hinged flap; (2) combined movement of two sequential airfoil segments is attempted to achieve a smoother camber variation. The present fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model is employed with the aim to quantify its effect and benefits on the active shape control of the morphing airfoil, the actuator response, and the aerodynamic performance including lift and drag coefficients. The presented results demonstrate the robustness and numerical performance of the developed FSI method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it