MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2884805394 · doi:10.1039/c8cp03118e

Extracting multivalent detachment rates from heterogeneous nanoparticle populations

2018· article· en· W2884805394 on OpenAlexaff
Mingqiu Wang, Jun Allard, Jered B. Haun

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
KeywordsNanoparticleKineticsNanotechnologyChemistryMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanoparticles can form multiple bonds with target surfaces, thereby increasing adhesion strength and internalization rate into cells. This property has helped to drive interest in nanoparticles as delivery vehicles for drugs and imaging agents, but significant gaps in our understanding of multivalent adhesion make it difficult to control and optimize binding dynamics. In previous work, we experimentally observed that multivalent nanoparticle adhesion can exhibit a time-dependent detachment rate. However, simulations later indicated that the underlying cause was variability in the number of bonds that formed between individual nanoparticles within the population. Here, we use this insight to develop a simple model to isolate a series of constant detachment rates from such heterogeneous populations. Using simulations of experimental data to train the model, we first classified nanoparticles within a given population based on the most likely equilibrium bond number, which we termed the bond potential. We then assumed that each bond potential category would follow standard first-order kinetics with constant detachment rates. Model results matched the population binding data, but only if we further divided each bond potential category into two sub-components, the second of which did not detach. We then utilized bonding rates from the simulation to estimate detachment rates for the second, slower detaching sub-component. These results confirm our hypothesis that nanoparticle populations can be sub-divided based on bond potential, each of which could be characterized by a constant detachment rate. Finally, we established relationships between the new heterogeneous population detachment model and a time-dependent, empirical detachment model that we developed in previous work. This could make it possible to determine bond potential distributions directly from experimental data without computationally costly simulations, which will be explored in future work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→