MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884853450 · doi:10.1139/cjas-2018-0060

Effect of altering the ratio of exogenous gonadotropins on reproductive performance of primiparous sows during the seasonal infertility period

2018· article· en· W2884853450 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nutthee Am-in, Mongkol Techakumphu, R. N. Kirkwood

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersThailand Research Fund
KeywordsEstrous cycleEquine chorionic gonadotropinLitterHuman chorionic gonadotropinInfertilityWeaningGonadotropinEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicineBiologyAnimal scienceAndrologyOvulationPregnancyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At weaning, 150 primiparous sows were assigned sequentially to receive 400 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) with 200 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (Gn600), or 400 IU eCG with 400 IU hCG (Gn800), or served as untreated controls. Compared with control and Gn600, the Gn800 had increased estrus response by day 7 and reduced wean-to-estrus intervals (P < 0.05). Compared with controls, both Gn600 and Gn800 increased numbers of large follicles (≥6 mm) at estrus detection (P < 0.05) and the subsequent farrowing rates (P < 0.05). Litter size was unaffected. These data demonstrate the efficacy of supplemental hCG for alleviating effects of seasonal infertility in primiparous sows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207