MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885059027 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2018.2864281

Partially Blind Joint Channel Estimation and Symbol Detection in Amplify-and-Forward Two-Way Relay Systems

2018· article· en· W2885059027 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Masjedi, Ali Mohammad Doost-Hoseini, Mohammad Mahdi Naghsh, Saeed Gazor

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersIsfahan University of TechnologyIran National Science Foundation
KeywordsAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)RelayBlock (permutation group theory)Convergence (economics)Computational complexity theoryComputer scienceDetectorMathematicsReciprocalJoint (building)Symbol (formal)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate a partially blind channel estimation and symbol detection in an amplify-and-forward two way relay scheme. We derive generalized likelihood ratio test detectors for reciprocal and non-reciprocal channels, whose computational complexity (CC) grow exponentially with the block length. Therefore, we propose a convergent iterative method for joint channel estimation and symbol detection with CC proportional to the block length. We also address the convergence proof. We further propose the simple blind and partially-blind approaches based on least squares (LS) and weighted LS estimation, respectively, for operation at low SNRs and analyze their mean square errors (MSE). Our simulations reveal the effectiveness of the proposed method compared with its counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207