MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885080048 · doi:10.1109/ipdpsw.2018.00047

GraphNER: Using Corpus Level Similarities and Graph Propagation for Named Entity Recognition

2018· article· en· W2885080048 on OpenAlexaff
Golnar Sheikhshab, Elizabeth Starks, Aly Karsan, Readman Chiu, Anoop Sarkar, İnanç Birol

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConditional random fieldNamed-entity recognitionComputer scienceNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceGraphTask (project management)Sequence labelingInformation retrievalMachine learningTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapidly growing amount of research papers in computational biology makes it difficult for researchers to keep up to date on new results. The motivation behind this paper is to use natural language processing to automatically understand relevant concepts from the large amount of text data in published papers in computational biology. As a proof-of-concept, we focus on the gene mention detection task, which allows us to identify genes that are being discussed in papers, making it possible to search for concepts like genes rather than searching on words. In this paper we introduce GraphNER, a semi-supervised machine learning model for named entity recognition (NER). In particular, we use GraphNER to identify gene mentions in natural language data such as biomedical papers. It combines training data where the gene mentions are identified by human experts and unlabelled data that contains many other relevant gene mentions. The labeled and unlabeled data are linked together using similarities between n-grams that occur in the two data sources (an n-gram is a contiguous sequence of n words in the text). GraphNER uses the information gleaned from this graph, and combines it with a conditional random field (CRF) model for NER. We consider two different CRF-based NER systems on two different datasets combined with our graph model for semi-supervised learning for the task of gene mention detection. We show that GraphNER consistently improves the overall quality of gene mention detection due to its higher precision. GraphNER is freely available at http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/ bioinfo/software/graphner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207