MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885129760 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-5359

Abstract 5359: Regulatory germline variants in 10,389 adult cancers

2018· article· en· W2885129760 on OpenAlexaff
Kuan‐lin Huang, Amila Weerasinghe, Yige Wu, Wen-Wei Liang, R. Jay Mashl, Sheila M. Reynolds, Kathleen E. Houlahan, Ninad Oak, The Cancer Genome Atlas, Alexander J. Lazar, Michael C. Wendel, Ekta Khurana, Sharon E. Plon, Feng Chen, Mark Gerstein, Ilya Shmulevich, Li Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermlineBiologyGeneticsGermline mutationCancerGeneMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Previous studies of rare germline variants in cancer has largely been limited to the coding regions of known predisposition genes. The TCGA PanCanAtlas Germline Working Group is analyzing germline predisposing variants of 10,389 cases in 33 cancer types. We deployed more than 121,000 virtual machines running for over 600,000 hours on the ISB Cancer Genome Cloud to conduct massively parallel variant calling and analyses, and the resulting data are shared with scientists across institutions worldwide. Carriers of the functional regulatory variants add on to the 8.9% of cases carrying known pathogenic variants. Burden analyses reveal enrichment of rare variants in the 3'UTR region of NHP2 and POLH. Further, we observed variants aggregating in conserved regions of selected microRNA families that are also affected by somatic mutations, including mir-17 and mir-29. We nominate regulatory variants by using GWAVA and FunSeq2 corroborated with their enrichment in cancer. The prioritized variants are then further evaluated by further co-occurrence of two-hit events and expression changes in their respective tumor samples. Finally, we examine ancestries, familial history and age at onset for carriers of these variants. Overall, we aim to discover and establish the role of regulatory germline variants in oncogenesis. Citation Format: Kuan-lin Huang, Amila Weerasinghe, Yige Wu, Wen-wei Liang, R. Jay Mashl, Sheila Reynolds, Kathleen E. Houlahan, Ninad Oak, The Cancer Genome Atlas, Alexander J. Lazar, Michael C. Wendel, Ekta Khurana, Sharon Plon, Feng Chen, Mark Gerstein, Ilya Shmulevich, Li Ding. Regulatory germline variants in 10,389 adult cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5359.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207