MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885147309 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.70.031302

Halo neutrons and the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>decay of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Li</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2004· article· lv· W2885147309 on OpenAlexafffund
F. Sarazin, Jim Al-Khalili, G. C. Ball, G. Hackman, P. M. Walker, R. A. E. Austin, B. Eshpeter, P. Finlay, P. E. Garrett, G. F. Grinyer, K. A. Koopmans, W. D. Kulp, J. R. Leslie, D. Melconian, C. J. Osborne, M. A. Schumaker, H. C. Scraggs, J. von Schwarzenberg, M. B. Smith, C. E. Svensson, J. C. Waddington, John L. Wood

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2004
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of GuelphMcMaster UniversityTRIUMF
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryTRIUMFColorado School of MinesU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsNeutronEnergy (signal processing)HaloAtomic physicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay of $^{11}\mathrm{Li}$ has been investigated at TRIUMF-ISAC using a high-efficiency array of Compton suppressed $\mathrm{HPGe}$ detectors. From a line-shape analysis of the Doppler-broadened peaks observed in the $^{10}\mathrm{Be}$ $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ spectrum, both the half-lives of states in $^{10}\mathrm{Be}$ and the energies of the $\ensuremath{\beta}$-delayed neutrons feeding those states were obtained. Furthermore, it was possible to determine the excitation energies of the parent states in $^{11}\mathrm{B}\mathrm{e}$ with uncertainties comparable to those obtained from neutron spectroscopy experiments. These data suggest that the $\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay to the $8.81\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{MeV}$ state in $^{11}\mathrm{Be}$ occurs in the $^{9}\mathrm{Li}$ core and that one neutron comprising the halo of $^{11}\mathrm{Li}$ survives in a halolike configuration after the $\ensuremath{\beta}$-delayed neutron emission from this level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207