Parents entendants d’enfants sourds en France : récits de mères illustrant les écarts entre discours officiels et pratiques des professionnels face à la diversité des modèles de communication existants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article, issu de notre recherche doctorale, propose d’analyser, dans le cadre d’entretiens semi-directifs réalisés en France, les témoignages de parents entendants découvrant la surdité de leur enfant. Nous avons analysé le parcours de ces parents, du dépistage néonatal à l’annonce de la surdité, leurs attentes en termes d’informations de la part des professionnels puis en termes d’accompagnement. Si les textes officiels prônent la prise en compte de la diversité des situations familiales et si plusieurs options linguistiques et éducatives ou cliniques sont offertes aux parents, traduisant divers modèles de communication à leur disposition, la réalité des pratiques hiérarchisées et discontinues semble loin de ces discours officiels de choix, de conseil et de suivi personnalisé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".