MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Resource Provisioning and Scheduling of Big Data Processing Jobs

2018· book-chapter· en· W2885194465 on OpenAlex
Rajni Aron, Deepak Aggarwal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in data mining and database management book series · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingProvisioningBig dataComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Data processingResource (disambiguation)Distributed computingData scienceDatabaseOperating systemEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud Computing has become a buzzword in the IT industry. Cloud Computing which provides inexpensive computing resources on the pay-as-you-go basis is promptly gaining momentum as a substitute for traditional Information Technology (IT) based organizations. Therefore, the increased utilization of Clouds makes an execution of Big Data processing jobs a vital research area. As more and more users have started to store/process their real-time data in Cloud environments, Resource Provisioning and Scheduling of Big Data processing jobs becomes a key element of consideration for efficient execution of Big Data applications. This chapter discusses the fundamental concepts supporting Cloud Computing & Big Data terms and the relationship between them. This chapter will help researchers find the important characteristics of Cloud Resource Management Systems to handle Big Data processing jobs and will also help to select the most suitable technique for processing Big Data jobs in Cloud Computing environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0040.026
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it