MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885284731 · doi:10.1080/00029890.2019.1632629

Fourier Transform Inversion Using an Elementary Differential Equation and a Contour Integral

2019· preprint· en· W2885284731 on OpenAlexaff
Erik Talvila

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mathematical Monthly · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeaviside step functionMathematicsLebesgue integrationMethods of contour integrationFourier inversion theoremFourier transformMathematical analysisRiemann integralInversion (geology)Line integralParseval's theoremIntegral equationFourier analysisFourier integral operatorFractional Fourier transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let f be a function on the real line. The Fourier transform inversion theorem is proved under the assumption that f is absolutely continuous such that f and f′ are Lebesgue integrable. A function g is defined by f′(t)−iwf(t)=g(t). This differential equation has a well-known integral solution using the Heaviside step function. An elementary calculation with residues is used to write the Heaviside step function as a simple contour integral. The rest of the proof requires straightforward manipulation of integrals. Hence, the Fourier transform inversion theorem is proved with very little machinery. With only minor changes the method is also used to prove the inversion theorem for functions of several variables and to prove Riemann’s localization theorem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Mathematical MonthlySame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207