MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2885529712 · doi:10.1158/1557-3265.ovca17-pr13

Abstract PR13: TERT is frequently mutated in adult-type granulosa cell tumors of the ovary compared to other malignant sex cord-stromal tumors

2018· article· en· W2885529712 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica A. Pilsworth, Dawn R. Cochrane, Zhouchunyang Xia, Geraldine Aubert, Anniina Färkkilä, Hugo M. Horlings, Satoshi Yanagida, Winnie Yang, Jamie Lim, Yikan Wang, Ali Bashashati, Jacqueline Keul, Adele Wong, Esther Oliva, Sohrab P. Shah, Stefan Kommoss, Friedrich Kommoss, Peter M. Lansdorp, Duncan M. Baird, David G. Huntsman

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelomeraseBiologyTelomerase reverse transcriptaseCarcinogenesisTelomereSomatic cellCancer researchMutationGranulosa cellMolecular biologyOvaryCancerGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene is highly expressed in stem cells and silenced upon differentiation. Cancer cells can attain immortality by activating TERT to maintain telomere length and telomerase activity, a crucial step of tumorigenesis. Two somatic mutations in the TERT promoter (C228T; C250T) have been identified in multiple cancers, such as melanoma and glioblastoma, as gain-of-function mutations that promote transcriptional activation of TERT. A recent study investigating TERT promoter mutations in ovarian carcinomas found mutations in 15% of clear cell carcinomas. However, it is unknown whether these mutations are prevalent in adult-type granulosa cell tumors (AGCTs) of the ovary, Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs), and other malignant sex cord-stromal tumors. We performed whole-genome sequencing on ten AGCT cases with matched normal and identified the TERT C228T promoter mutation in 50% of cases. We found that AGCT cases with mutated TERT promoter have increased expression of TERT mRNA compared to those with wild-type TERT promoter. All five TERT promoter mutated cases had high levels of TERT mRNA expression, whereas three of the five wild-type TERT cases had no measurable TERT mRNA expression. There was a tendency towards longer telomere lengths in AGCT cases with the TERT promoter mutation relative to those without, although it was not statistically significant. These results suggest that telomerase may be activated by a different method in the cases with no TERT promoter mutations but have TERT mRNA expression. The remaining cases with neither TERT promoter mutations nor TERT mRNA expression likely maintain their telomeres using a telomerase-independent method, such as the alternative lengthening of telomeres pathway. TERT C228T allelic discrimination analysis of 331 AGCTs, 5 SLCTs, and 18 other malignant sex cord-stromal tumors detected the mutation in 56/247 (23%) of primary AGCTs, 22/84 (26%) of recurrent AGCTs, 1/5 (20%) of SLCTs and (0/18) 0% of other malignant sex cord-stromal tumors. The single SLCT case with the TERT promoter mutation was poorly differentiated and harbored the pathognomonic FOXL2 mutation of AGCT, suggesting this SLCT case may actually be an AGCT. In 204 AGCT cases with available survival data, there was a trend towards worse disease-specific survival in patients with the TERT promoter mutation compared to those without; however, statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.128, log-ranked test). In 5 AGCT cases with primary and recurrent tissues, we found that the TERT promoter mutation was absent in the primary tumors but present in the recurrent tumors, suggesting that TERT C228T mutation may play an active role in progression of AGCTs. Overall, we found that TERT C228T promoter mutation was most common in AGCTs among the different malignant sex cord-stromal tumors. Our data confirm the activation of telomerase in AGCTs via TERT C228T promoter mutation, although alternative telomerase activation methods in AGCTs may exist. Our results suggest that TERT activation may play a role in AGCT recurrence. As such, telomere biology may be important for the progression of AGCTs. This abstract is also being presented as Poster B54. Citation Format: Jessica A. Pilsworth, Dawn R. Cochrane, Zhouchunyang Xia, Geraldine Aubert, Anniina E. M. Färkkilä, Hugo M. Horlings, Satoshi Yanagida, Winnie Yang, Jamie L. P. Lim, Yikan Wang, Ali Bashashati, Jacqueline Keul, Adele Wong, Esther Oliva, Sohrab P. Shah, Stefan Kommoss, Friedrich Kommoss, Peter M. Lansdorp, Duncan M. Baird, David G. Huntsman. TERT is frequently mutated in adult-type granulosa cell tumors of the ovary compared to other malignant sex cord-stromal tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Conference: Addressing Critical Questions in Ovarian Cancer Research and Treatment; Oct 1-4, 2017; Pittsburgh, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(15_Suppl):Abstract nr PR13.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence→French-language works237,207→