MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2885542511 · doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.06.002

Do 5α-Reductase Inhibitors Raise Circulating Serum Testosterone Levels? A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis to Explaining Paradoxical Results

2018· review· en· W2885542511 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulmaged M. Traish, Yonah Krakowsky, Gheorghe Doros, Abraham Morgentaler

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Medicine Reviews · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSex hormone-binding globulinDihydrotestosteroneFinasterideDutasterideTestosterone (patch)MedicineMeta-analysisInternal medicineLuteinizing hormone5 Alpha-Reductase InhibitorEndocrinologyHormoneAndrogenProstate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Many studies have reported that 5α-reductase inhibitors (finasteride and dutasteride) raise serum testosterone (T) levels, yet there is lack of consistency among studies on this point. AIM: To review and meta-analyze available studies reporting changes in serum T concentrations in men treated with 5α-reductase inhibitors (5α-RIs). METHODS: A Medline search using PubMed and EMBASE was performed including the following key words: "finasteride," "dutasteride," "testosterone and 5α-reductases." MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relevant studies were extracted, evaluated, and analyzed. Of these, 40 studies were analyzed qualitatively and 11 were included in the meta-analysis. A random effects model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. RESULTS: In 11 studies comprising 1,784 patients with age ranging between 18 and 83 years and average treatment follow-up of 17 months, meta-analytic estimate of the mean baseline change was 27 (95% confidence interval 1-54). The meta-analysis did not demonstrate unequivocal significant increase in serum T levels. The increase was not uniform among all studies reported. Sensitivity analysis showed that no single study contributed decisively to the outcome or could be attributed to drug action. The reported increases in T levels with finasteride or dutasteride in men with low baseline serum T may be attributed, in part, to increased trapping of T by unsaturated sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) due to dissociation of 5α-dihydrotestosterone. In men with high baseline T levels, there appears to be no change in serum T levels. 10 studies reported luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, SHBG, and estradiol values and none reported significant changes in their levels, suggesting that observed changes in serum T levels are unlikely mediated by gonadotropins levels or peripheral conversion of T to estradiol. CONCLUSION: 5α-RI therapy is not associated with consistent and significant increases in serum T levels. Traish AM, Krakowsky Y, Doros G, et al. Do 5α-reductase inhibitors raise circulating serum testosterone levels? A comprehensive review and meta-analysis to explaining paradoxical results. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:95-114.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.039
Bibliometrics0.0100.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.443
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.024 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexual Medicine ReviewsSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207